Hi Franklin,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:39:54PM +0800, Franklin Weng wrote:
> Sorry for forgetting to reply your last ping.
I admit I'm super happy about your current response. ;-)
> Currently all the work on ezgo packages are here:
> https://gitlab.com/franklin1/debian-ezgo-temp
> I used to send a mail asking you about removing all the current content on
> debian blend and replaced by the contents of my current working repository
> (i.e., moving back from gitlab to ezgo). But it's been a long time ago (at
> least one year before but I didn't go finding it out).
>
> In the gitlab working repository I've updated it, preparing for ezgo15.
Would you mind to work on
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/ezgo
This is where *official* Blends are maintained and where you can get help
from the Blends team.
> About ezgo-phet which is the PhET offline package, which we recommend a lot
> but IIRC you said I couldn't put it in ezgo blends, I created another
> repository here: https://gitlab.com/franklin1/ezgo-phet
If I remember correctly it just does not belong into the *metapackages*
that where created by the ezgo source package. Its perfectly fine to
create a separate source and binary package ezgo-phet and in the
metapackage add a dependency from this. But you should do that *right
now* to not miss the deadline for the freeze for Debian 11.
> Not sure what I should do next. I'll highly appreciate for your advices.
Create a packaging repository for
https://salsa.debian.org/???/ezgo-phet.git
and package ezgo-phet there. The '???' are intentional since I have
no idea where the best place might be. There is always
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ezgo-phet.git
but I'd rather put those packages under team maintenance. So the
question is whether we should ask Salsa admins to create ezgo-team.
That would make sense if you plan to provide more ezgo specific
packages. We have such teams for every other Blend so that would make
perfectly sense - if and only if you would maintain your packages there.
> Regards, Franklin
Kind regards and thanks for your work on ezgo
Andreas.
> Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> 於 2020年12月17日 週四 下午5:29寫道：
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > this is my last warning before I'll ask ftpmaster for removal of the
> > ezgo package. I personally consider it a shame since I think its a
> > valuable contribution for our users but since it is not maintained it
> > might confuse users more than it might help them.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 03:03:44PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Hi Franklin,
> > >
> > > this is another ping. Would you mind clarifying the situation of the
> > > ezgo metapackages. These are not maintained for a very long time. We
> > > are facing the freeze for the next Debian stable release in about three
> > > months. I consider ezgo not of releasable quality. Thus I'm tempted to
> > > file an RC bug to remove it from Debian testing. Please let me know if
> > > something remains unclear - I'll happily help you to fix ezgo
> > > metapackages but we need some dialogue to make sure we have the same
> > > expectations about these packages.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > >
> > > Andreas.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:33:02AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > Hi Franklin,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 09:32:19PM +0800, Franklin Weng wrote:
> > > > > I've set up a temporary git repository. Please see:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://gitlab.com/franklin1/debian-ezgo-temp
> > > >
> > > > Besides the issue Jonas mentioned, I think there is another no-go: You
> > > > can not simply throw a PhET tarball into the Debian source archive and
> > > > unpack it in the postinst script. The correct was is to create a phet
> > > > package and make an ezgo metapackage depend from it.
> > > >
> > > > In short: Blends source packages might carry some artwork or
> > localisation
> > > > stuff that does not have some separate upstream project but not whole
> > > > third parties as payload.
> > > >
> > > > Please find a way to distribute this separately from the ezgo source
> > > > package.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you in any case for your work on ezgo
> > > >
> > > > Andreas.
> > > >
> > > > > It contains the contents which works in our current ezgo version.
> > > > >
> > > > > As what I have said, there are three kinds of packages in this
> > repository:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. meta packages which will install more free software packages:
> > > > > * defined in tasks, and will generate ezgo-office, ezgo-graphics,
> > > > > ezgo-multimedia, ezgo-network, ezgo-games, ezgo-education,
> > > > > ezgo-accessories and ezgo-tasks
> > > > > 2. ezgo common packages, including public domain resources and
> > packages
> > > > > which would "fix" problems or add features to current software
> > packages:
> > > > > * ezgo packages used by all system: ezgo-artwork, ezgo-gallery,
> > > > > ezgo-menu (independent versioning)
> > > > > * public domain resources: ezgo-phet, ezgo-wordtest
> > > > > * fixing or adding features to current software: ezgo-misc-*
> > > > > 3. desktop environment setup:
> > > > > * ezgo-kde5, ezgo-lxde, ezgo-xfce
> > > > > * ezgo-gnome and ezgo-unity are dropped for now due to outdated
> > and
> > > > > lack of test
> > > > >
> > > > > I've tested them on Debian Stretch. I can now set up a Debian
> > Stretch
> > > > > with KDE Plasma desktop, then install ezgo-artwork, ezgo-kde5,
> > > > > ezgo-menu, and necessary ezgo-misc / ezgo meta packages, to form a
> > > > > (nearly) complete ezgo system.
> > > > >
> > > > > My problems are that, some of them would need to modify files which
> > were
> > > > > installed by other packages. For example, ezgo-misc-audacity moves
> > > > > locales/zh/LC_MESSAGES/audacity.mo to zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/ so that
> > zh_TW
> > > > > translation could work. AFAIK it violates Debian packaging rules but
> > > > > such fix was necessary. Another example is ezgo-lxde which would
> > change
> > > > > the file content in /etc/xdg/lxsession/Lubuntu/desktop.conf.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please have a look at this repository and let's discuss the next
> > step to
> > > > > upload these packages back to Debian.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Franklin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://fam-tille.de
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://fam-tille.de
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
>
>
> --
> Franklin Weng
> 中華民國軟體自由協會常務理事
> LibreOffice 導入專家
> LibreOffice 法人代表文件基金會董事會副主席、認證委員會委員
--
http://fam-tille.de