Re: Accepted blends 0.6.101 (source) into experimental
Hi Ole,
thanks a lot for working on this!
I've tested this but I get:
med(master) $ make dist
rm -f debian-med-tasks.desc debian/control
make -f debian/rules get-orig-source
make[1]: Verzeichnis „/home/andreas/debian-maintain/salsa/blends/med“ wird betreten
make -f /usr/share/blends-dev/Makefile debian-med-tasks.desc
make[2]: Verzeichnis „/home/andreas/debian-maintain/salsa/blends/med“ wird betreten
/usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control -r UNRELEASED -S -t
Can't open file /var/lib/apt/lists/_tmp_autopkgtest.qDlH8X_binaries_Packages: No such file or directory
I do not have permission to write to /var/lib/debtags/
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 462, in update
pulse_interval)
apt_pkg.Error: E:Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'test -x /usr/bin/apt-show-versions || exit 0 ; apt-show-versions -i', E:Sub-process returned an error code
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control", line 794, in <module>
blend += aptcache(args.release)
File "/usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control", line 729, in aptcache
c.update()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 464, in update
raise FetchFailedException(e)
apt.cache.FetchFailedException: E:Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'test -x /usr/bin/apt-show-versions || exit 0 ; apt-show-versions -i', E:Sub-process returned an error code
/usr/share/blends-dev/Makefile:27: die Regel für Ziel „debian-med-tasks.desc“ scheiterte
make[2]: *** [debian-med-tasks.desc] Fehler 1
make[2]: Verzeichnis „/home/andreas/debian-maintain/salsa/blends/med“ wird verlassen
I'm running this command as normal user (not root) and think that we
should not require root permissions to create blends metapackages.
Users can not write to /var/lib/apt and thus
Can't open file /var/lib/apt/lists/
seems to be the hint for the actual problem.
BTW, I think the rewrite of the script is a good reason to bump the
version of the package to 0.7.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: