Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table
Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hmmmm,
> but no --udd option for the /usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control
> call. How are you triggering the UDD option at your side?
Inside of blend-gen-control, see
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/blends/commit/dc6f7bc9.patch :
if 'GENCONTROL_OPTS' in os.environ:
opts = parser.parse_args(os.environ['GENCONTROL_OPTS'].split())
parser.set_defaults(**opts.__dict__)
> I also need to admit that the issue with libodil0-dev remains:
> It is in Suggests when using --udd and in Recommends without
> UDD.
Harr, they trapped me in the backslash hell. But now I could escape
using even more backslashes. Can you re-check?
> BTW, I invented the debug[1] task to have short tasks featuring only the
> critical parts in the tasks. I'd recommend to add libodil0-dev there
> and may be you add some logging feature with more verbose debug output.
Would probably be good. The problem is however the UDD content is a
moving target, and so that one provides may change over time.
Cheers
Ole
Reply to: