Re: [SCM] science branch, master, updated. 62a9741420de5201ef8c55e8db751b3709150359
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>> I think the change of priority from extra to optional is wrong. Per
>> policy packages with priority optional can not Depend / Recommend
>> packages with priority extra. Since we have no way to control the
>> priority of all dependencies the metapackages should remain at priority
>> extra. Alternatively the every single priority of metapackages needs
>> to be set explicitly.
> OK, that is a good point; I didn' think on it. I'll just revert the
> Priority to extra for the moment.
IIRC the plan for optional/extra was to delete extra entirely. No idea
what happened to that idea.