Quoting Andreas Tille (2014-10-26 17:17:37) > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 02:49:24PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> [IMO it should not] be mandatory for blend packages to be tagged as >> metapackages (in the form they are currently handled). > > It is not mandatory by blends-dev. [implementation details skipped] > For me it becomes more and more evident that we need to discuss more > on this list about needs of different Blends and how to correctly > implement this. Well, one reason for lack of discussion in the past is that (as far as I am aware) only one tool for creating blends have existed: blends-dev. Assuming you mean discussion (also) across tools, I look forward to some friendly competition, now that boxer is finally in a reasonably usable state (after 2 failed attempts, first one dating back to February 2011). If all goes well (after dramatic events less than an hour before deadline of "freeze minus 10 days" - see details at bug#766903), it is likely that boxer even enters Jessie! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature