Re: Additional fields in debian/upstream?
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:16:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> you are welcome to use arbitrary fields in debian/upstream; I chose YAML as the
> syntax in order to make this easy.
>
> However, I would recommend to aim at a simple structure: one field per ID, instead
> of a mapping (hash) of IDs.
Not yet fluent in the language at this end. Are you saying that:
Also-Known-As:
NeuroLex: someid
NITRC: some other id
should rather be
NeuroLex-ID: someid
NITRC-ID: some other id
?
If that is the case, I'd like to have some reasoning what advantages
this would have. Currently, I can only see that disadvantage that the
logical/semantic grouping of fields with similar purpose is lost. After
all we do:
Reference:
Author: ...
...
as well.
Thanks for the anticipated enlightenment ;-)
Michael
--
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de
Reply to: