Re: Currently uncategorized packages maintained by DebiChem team
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:41:46AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Well, I am not convinced they should be in a task, at least most of them
> probably shouldn't. Possibly it makes sense to introduce a task like
> "debichem-toolbox" or something, where the non-end-user-applications
> could live in.
Why do you think tasks are only targeting at end users? I use them for
installation on my boxes as well. You should rather specify the target
audience in the description of the task so an end user will be informed
that these packages are probably not well suited for him.
> But I think it might be useful to have a mechanism which includes
> packages in the web-sentinel, but no in some user-exposed tasks, maybe
> by filtering per maintainer?
I'm not sure if I understand your proposal correctly. Could you be more
verbosely? For now I do not really see to add extra code which might
make things more complicated (it is not only about the code also the
syntax of the tasks files becomes more complicated) if the problem can
be handled with proper description as suggested above.