[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: thoughts on a new name


On Wednesday 24 September 2008 20:37, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> I am quite opposed to just going back to "Debian subprojects" because
> then we lose the distinction altogether that we're trying to make.  The
> idea that when you set out to make a "Debian-derived distribution", if
> you follow the CDD approach, you and your users are much better off is
> very hard to express if you don't have a name for the alternative.

what _is_ the CDD approach?

	Holger </innocent look>

Attachment: pgpYCKmoWw1dd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: