Hi, On Tuesday 26 August 2008 12:44, Ben Armstrong wrote: > The second uses a different sort of wordplay than DIS -> DISh that is a > bit more subtle. We stand the original acronym CDD on its head: > > Custom Debian Distribution (CDD) > > becomes > > Debian Custom Contribution (DCC) > > It has been observed before that "custom" paired with "distribution" is > problematic because it suggests starting with Debian and ending up with > something different, a fork. But replace the outward-moving "dis-" > with the inward-moving "con-" and flip the words around and everything > is set right again! We customize, but everything is given back -- > contributed -- to Debian. > > This second suggestion is the best I have been able to come up with so > far. I like it. (Better that DISh.) regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpEU8kxvzluF.pgp
Description: PGP signature