Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)

To: debian-custom@lists.debian.org, debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:23:01 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200803031123.02349.debian@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.00.0803030940460.26687@wr-linux02>
References: <20080226175431.GA10289@roeckx.be> <200803021322.30006.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.00.0803030940460.26687@wr-linux02>

Hi,

On Monday 03 March 2008 09:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > use Arch:any.
> ... based on packages that are available in i386?

No. Based on the list of packages which are available for each arch.



regards,
	HOlger

Attachment: pgpwGFWfDBPfg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>

References:
- Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>

Prev by Date: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Next by Date: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Previous by thread: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Next by thread: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread