Re: Status of the CDD Toolkit
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:22 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> While Debian-Jr decided to set the focus on DebTags I think having
> something that supports metapackages is still important. IMHO
> DebTags might have great advantages over metapackages I think we
> should do this *in adition* and not as a replacement. Thus having
> stable methods to build metapackages is important, IMHO.
Debtags only addresses a fraction of the needs of CDDs. I'd be
interested in seeing CDDT take debtags into account alongside
metapackages.
Ben
Reply to: