On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:32:50AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: > In fact, my idea for cdd::* tags can be implemented using an existing > debtags aspect, "suite::" (described as "The package is related to a > bigger group of packages"). In the case of chemtool, in addition to > adding the new field:: tag, I would add suite::med:core. There! Suite is a *great* idea! I finally managed to read this thread and I wasn't convinced of using suite for two unrelated things, namely quality assessment and kind of audience. Then you suddenly and smartly mention suite, and everything fits together. You can, I think and propose, use suite:: to do the quality assessment, as in: suite::debianjr:core suite::debianjr:extra Then use the 'junior' facet to identify the target audience. Incidentally, this gives yet another, and more interesting meaning, to the suite:: facet: identifying a group of packages which constitutes a project of its own: Gnome, KDE, Debian-Junior, Debian-Med, GNUStep, rather than to messily group a package with its plugins (cfr. apache, emacs, gkrellm). That last one can really be done with Enhances: fields or some other way. Ben, please feel free to edit the vocabulary in svn. If you don't have commit access, let me know/post the patch in the list, and I'll add you. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature