CDDs and the Vancouver proposal

[David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>]

Hi CDD-*!

In the wake of the Vancouver proposal, it was discussed that some arches might 
be better off if they only try to release a subset of the REGULAR packages in 
the IRREGULAR track of their arch.

Now it struck me, that applying the IRREGULAR mechanics to CDDs could be 
reasonable too; there are specific needs addressed, most of which should be 
merged with REGULAR Debian medium- to long-term but which should not 
interfere too much with REGULAR releases.

Leveraging the infrastructure-to-be of IRREGULAR arches trying to mimic most 
of the REGULAR release for IRREGULAR releases of CDDs for REGULAR arches 
might be worth thinking about.


If this is only stupid blubber for you, please ignore this mail.



Regards, David

-- 
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
 -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15