Re: custom branding and CDDs
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 07:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The main problem is to increase the sensibility of maintainers to accept that
> there is a certain need for preconfiguration which IMHO enhances the quality
> of packages for Debian also in general. Perhaps it was a little bit short
> cutted wording in my previous mails and I hope that it was not interpreted
> as an invitation to NMU for everybody. The question is whether we might
> gain some acceptance for an NMU if the only alternative would be a fork.
I don't think we'll get the results we desire without the teeth of
policy.
> (You see that a proper wording is absolutely necessary ...)
Are we actively seeking any changes to policy? If not, then why not?
If so, then which policies, and where are the drafts?
Ben
--
Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca>
Reply to: