|| On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:38:08 -0300 || Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca> wrote: ba> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> I believe arch should be considered as well, when one decide if the >> version control system should be changed. Being able to do off-line >> commits is a good thing. :) ba> I must defer to the better judgement of those who have had experience ba> with each. All I know about either is second-hand. I have heard lots ba> of good reports about Subversion, but very little (good or bad) about ba> Arch, so I'll need lots of convincing to cast my vote with Arch. Looking today at internet I found a really interesting tool: http://svk.elixus.org/ This add the decentralized version control system to Subversion. Really interesting. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgpFvembjX0KW.pgp
Description: PGP signature