Re: MPI vs PVM
>>>>> "heiko" == Heiko Bauke <Heiko.Bauke@Physik.Uni-Magdeburg.DE> writes:
heiko> Some colleagues who have been at one of the last Super-Computer-Conferences
heiko> in Heidelberg told me that nobody was talking about PVM. PVM is almost
The other way to look at it is, since it works pretty well, there
isn't anything to fix (extend, perhaps, but that is HARNESS, etc).
Does MPI perform well on a heterogenenous cluster :-)?
A.J. Rossini Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
U. of Washington Biostatistics email@example.com
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net firstname.lastname@example.org
-------------- http://software.biostat.washington.edu/ ----------------
FHCRC: M: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
UW: Th: 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX
(my tuesday/wednesday/friday locations are completely unpredictable.)