[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: MPI vs PVM

>>>>> "heiko" == Heiko Bauke <Heiko.Bauke@Physik.Uni-Magdeburg.DE> writes:

    heiko> Some colleagues who have been at one of the last Super-Computer-Conferences
    heiko> in Heidelberg told me that nobody was talking about PVM. PVM is almost
    heiko> dead.

The other way to look at it is, since it works pretty well, there
isn't anything to fix (extend, perhaps, but that is HARNESS, etc).

Does MPI perform well on a heterogenenous cluster :-)?


A.J. Rossini				Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
U. of Washington Biostatistics		rossini@u.washington.edu	
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net	rossini@scharp.org
-------------- http://software.biostat.washington.edu/ ----------------
FHCRC: M: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
UW:   Th: 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX
(my tuesday/wednesday/friday locations are completely unpredictable.)

Reply to: