Re: Task: parallel-* ?
Adam C Powell IV <email@example.com> cum veritate scripsit:
> So what does go on a master/head node, but not on the others? Is there
> a need for such a -master task?
I don't remember if we included dhcp/bootp/rarp/tftp, but
if that's the case they would be on the master.
I am skeptical we can make it into the tasks now, and I
am also doubtful it should be a task.
Maybe a meta-package, just not task-parallel-*
but call it parallel-* ?
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4