Re: PETSc Debian package switch to lam?
Greetings! The problem here is that 6.5.2 has a compilation error
when compiling shared libs. This is a known issue, and is fixed in
cvs. I've discussed with the upstream maintainers, and they suggest I
package the cvs snapshot, as the fix required several changes which
are not organized into a single patch anywhere. I'm hesitant to
package a cvs snapshot for Debian, though, and am too busy with atlas
at the moment to comb through cvs myself.
The good news is that atlas should be ready this weekend, with any
luck.
Take care,
Viral <viral@debian.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:00:50PM +0300, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> > switching to lam unless we have the 6.5.2 stable version available in
> > debian which we do not. The 6.5.2 will require packaging changes,
> > the debian diffs for 6.3.2 won't work. I will present new versions for
> > testing soon hopefully. Anyway, the new lam version builds and installs
> > with ./configure, make and make install so it's quite trivial.
>
> Does that mean lam 6.5.2 will be in unstable anytime soon ?
> The last I heard, the lam maintainer said he was working on it. This was
> when it was released though.
> Also, it would be cool, if the lamtests were also packaged.
>
> viral
>
> --
> There's someone in my head but its not me.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-beowulf-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
Reply to: