Re: [Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@lsc.nd.edu>] Re: LAM: MPE support in lam?

["Eray Ozkural \(exa\)" <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>]

Camm Maguire wrote:
>  [Jeff]:
> LAM and MPICH evolved completely independantly, and hence have entirely
> different inner workings.  Unfortunately, it's not as simple as just
> getting the enumerated constants in our .h files to agree -- there's a lot
> of interworkings below the MPI layer in both LAM and MPICH, none of which
> is common between the two systems.
> 
> Sorry.  :-(

LAM and MPICH have completely different architectures so we can't
expect to have binary compatibility. At any rate, the MPI standard does not
specify binary compatibility.

Regards,

-- 
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo