Re: update-cluster and its problems in design
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 01:54:50AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> I would think updating the configuration files manually is a good enough thing,
> and it is being cautious, because failing to update configuration files is
> disastrous.
>
> So, although debconf interface looks nice, it is unrealistic to use it to
> automatically configure update-cluster.
Wait, I thought it would be a good idea to use the debconf interface
just to get user input to build cluster.xml, rather than using
update-cluster-add by hand. A user would run update-cluster-regenerate
manually to generate the configuration files then. This
doesn't violate the policy, and you get a convenient wrapper around
cluster.xml. Thats how it is done right now.
viral
--
http://www.infofin.com/~gandalf
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way,
The time is gone, the song is over, thought I'd something more to say.
Reply to: