Re: #define NR_TASKS ??
Previously Viral wrote:
> For the time being I defined it to be 1024 (hoping thats large and safe) but
> whats the deal with NR_TASKS in 2.4.4 ?
There is no NR_TASKS anymore, programs should just deal with the possibility
of an unlimited number of processes.
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |