Re: New LAM package
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 07:21:19PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Please also take a look at the package division/control stuff. I
> > really haven't tbhough this through completely yet, but just attempted
> > something quick to fit Debian policy. I'm sure we'll get rid of
> > mpi-runtime and mpi-dev virtual packages.
> Yipee!!! I was working on updating your 6.1 package to 6.2; I was about to
> write you about it, in particular about the shared libraries thing. lam is
> nightmarish to package...
Agreed! There's got to be an easier way...
> Camm, what are the names of the packages? I'd like to pull them out of
> incoming, if the current Incoming lag persists, the new packages are going
> to stay there for a while. Hmmm, now that I think about it... the .diff.gz
> and .dsc files should be enough... you did upload them to master, didn't
They're in Incoming/lam1_6.2b-pl3...deb, lam1-dev_6.2b-pl3...deb, and
lam1-runtime_6.2b-pl3...deb. All source/diff/dsc is there too.
> (BTW, IMO, you should upload a new 6.1 to slink-proposed-updates, the
> current ones are unusable because of that hardcoded path bug)
Ah, sorry! I didn't notice. Does one simply put
slink-proposed-updates in the distribution field of the control file?
> I guess I can go back to fighting with mosix...
BTW, 1) How are you thinking of doing MOSIX? 2) Is anyone interested
Camm Maguire firstname.lastname@example.org
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah