gccgo-go backport has broken dependencies
Dear maintainer,
The gccgo-go backport (currently 2:1.22~3~bpo12+1) is failing to install
on Bookworm, due to unmet dependencies.
Any chance of getting this fixed?
$ sudo apt install gccgo-go/bookworm-backports
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Selected version '2:1.22~3~bpo12+1' (Debian Backports:stable-backports [amd64]) for 'gccgo-go'
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
cpp-13-x86-64-linux-gnu : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.38) but 2.36-9+deb12u9 is to be installed
Depends: libgmp10 (>= 2:6.3.0+dfsg) but 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1 is to be installed
Depends: libzstd1 (>= 1.5.5) but 1.5.4+dfsg2-5 is to be installed
g++-13-x86-64-linux-gnu : Depends: libstdc++-13-dev (= 13.3.0-12) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.38) but 2.36-9+deb12u9 is to be installed
Depends: libgmp10 (>= 2:6.3.0+dfsg) but 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1 is to be installed
Depends: libzstd1 (>= 1.5.5) but 1.5.4+dfsg2-5 is to be installed
gcc-13-x86-64-linux-gnu : Depends: libcc1-0 (>= 13.3.0-12) but 12.2.0-14 is to be installed
Depends: libgcc-13-dev (= 13.3.0-12) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.38) but 2.36-9+deb12u9 is to be installed
Depends: libgmp10 (>= 2:6.3.0+dfsg) but 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1 is to be installed
Depends: libzstd1 (>= 1.5.5) but 1.5.4+dfsg2-5 is to be installed
gccgo-13-x86-64-linux-gnu : Depends: libgo-13-dev (>= 13.3.0-12) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.38) but 2.36-9+deb12u9 is to be installed
Depends: libgmp10 (>= 2:6.3.0+dfsg) but 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1 is to be installed
Depends: libzstd1 (>= 1.5.5) but 1.5.4+dfsg2-5 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Reply to: