[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bootstrap-html_5.3.3+dfsg-1~bpo12+2_multi.changes REJECTED



Micha Lenk <micha@debian.org> writes:

> Hi Philip,
>
> On 28.12.24 13:09, Micha Lenk wrote:
>>
>> On 28.12.24 12:58, Philip Hands wrote:
>>> The reason for this backport is that recent versions of openqa depend
>>> upon bootstrap 5.3.3, and I would like to upgrade the backport of openqa
>>> (which is already in bookworm-backports) when I upgrade the version of
>>> openqa in trixie.
>>
>> Ah, thanks for sharing your plan. Please re-upload. 
>
> I just realized that bootstrap 5.2.3 is already present in bookworm. 
> Does openqa really need the 5.3.3 version of bootstrap, or does it work 
> with 5.2.3 from bookworm too?

No, they really depend on 5.3.3 upstream.

https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/commit/65d4a5299259baf838504030603da133c1c02d13#diff-7ae45ad102eab3b6d7e7896acd08c427a9b25b346470d7bc6507b6481575d519L23

and attempting to build with 5.2.3 fails because some of the files
contained in bootstrap have changed names since then, and openqa refers
to the new (5.3.3) names.

Upstream jumped from using 4.6.1 straight to 5.3.3. They have never
attempted to use 5.2.3, so there's not a useful set of commits one could
revert, and their exhaustive testing has all been against 5.3.3, with no
testing whatsoever of something built with 5.2.3

That being the case, while I suppose one could try finding all those
changes in bootstrap and attempt to get openqa to use the old names in
order to check if it works, I'm not convinced that doing so would be a
worthwhile way to spend one's time.

> The version of openqa in sid doesn't declare a versioned dependency on 
> bootstrap. So, in its current version in Debian, the bootstrap version 
> available in bookworm seems to be good enough for building it.
>
> Is it maybe a bit too early to request a backport of bootstrap-html? 
> Would you mind to bring the full updated openqa stack to trixie before 
> you backport its individual dependencies to bookworm-backports?

I thought that I might be able to get on with something while I await
the arrival of the two node packages[1] currently in the NEW queue.

It makes no real difference whether bootstrap-html gets into backports
now, or when those two node packages do, as I won't be able to backport
the new version of openqa until all three are in backports anyway.

I also won't be able to upload a new openqa until they're through NEW,
hence the lack of a versioned depends in the current sid version.

Cheers, Phil.

[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/node-ace-code_1.35.4+~cs1.7.37-1.html
    https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/node-anser_2.3.0-1.html
-- 
Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: