On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 08:26:16PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 05:48:33PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Therefore, we've installed the latest qemu from bookworm-backports. However, > > libvirt is still too old, and doesn't know about this CPU. Therefore, nova > > thinks it's model is EPYC-Milan, and not EPYC-Genoa. > > Did you check if updating the cpu map in /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map/ is sufficient? Yeah, you could try cherry-picking just [1] and seeing whether that is enough. Since we might be looking into a stable upload (see [2]) soon, it could make sense to go that route instead of involving bookworm-backports and a full rebase. But I'm not at all familiar with the stable updates workflow, so I could be suggesting nonsense O:-) [1] https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/commit/bfe53e9145cd5996a791c5caff0686572b850f82 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/merge_requests/224 -- Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org> Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature