Re: Could scummvm be backported again?

To: debian-backports@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Could scummvm be backported again?
From: Matteo Bini <matteobin@tiepi.it>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 19:04:54 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] ZAtxRtydkGF5AG5W@mail.tiepi.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 823f03e91efeb21b5318b2c3ad773bce7e80985f.camel@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] ZAeLmOe4YS+GCXrx@mail.tiepi.it> <[🔎] 823f03e91efeb21b5318b2c3ad773bce7e80985f.camel@debian.org>

Thank you, Boyuan, you've done an amazing job as always!

All the best.

--
Matteo Bini

Reply to:

References:
- Could scummvm be backported again?
  - From: Matteo Bini <matteobin@tiepi.it>
- Re: Could scummvm be backported again?
  - From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Could scummvm be backported again?
Next by Date: Re: [bullseye-backport-request] wesnoth 1.6.x
Previous by thread: Re: Could scummvm be backported again?
Next by thread: python3-dmm_0.1.1-2~bpo1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread