hi, almost exactly a year ago... On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > So I'm going with option 1, preparing for an openjdk-17 in bullseye, and > preparing release notes and notes for security support. This is more > conservative than option 2, but allows to do better than the commitment made. > > The option also has the advantage that approval is only needed by the security > team. openjdk-17 already is in testing. granting unblock requests for new > snapshot builds by the release team would be appreciated, but isn't strictly > necessary as long as we can build newer snapshots. And that can be checked in > unstable. so, as I see it, openjdk-17 is in bullseye and now I'm wondering what I should do with #975016 titled "OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye" and filed against src:debian-security-support, as openjdk-17 seems to be supported and src:debian-security-support's purpose is to documented what's unsupported. so, should I just close this bug? -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ A ship is always safe at shore, but that is not what it's built for. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature