Hi, > Please explain which questions you are talking about, so far I was not > able to find a reason why there should not be a backport. > > Having a backport in general and using it as upgrade path are > completely unrelated things. As far as I saw mira came up with the question if ceph is supportable et al. I am usually not a big fan of packages in backports where it is unclear if it can be supported over the whole backports lifetime without hassle. I therefore wanted to wait until the thread is really done. Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP