Re: backporting iotop-c to oldstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 10:07 +0300, Boian Bonev wrote:
>
> I tried to figure out what the proper version should be, but the simplest
> working one I could think of is 1.17-1+deb11u1+bpo10+1 in order not to mess
> the
> upgrade paths. Is there a better way?
Please ignore this - all the time I think that the backport would go in stable
instead of oldstable and hence the confusion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=i0HO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: