[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#979987: vorta: Cant find pyqt5



Control: retitle -1 vorta: please resolve issues that are blocking a backport
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tag -1 confirmed

Dear Ilya,

Installing packages from unstable/sid, or testing (bullseye right now)
onto Debian stable is not a supported configuration.  You are of course
free to experiment, but this is a case where if something breaks, you
get to keep the pieces and debug the state of your system on your own.
For more information, see:

  https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian#Don.27t_make_a_FrankenDebian

Please don't use FrankenDebian on a production system unless you are
yourself ready to debug and fix any breakage.

That said, I do agree that users of stable (buster right now) should
have access to Vorta -- if at all possible :-) -- and to that end I have
started working on a backport.  While working on this I discovered
blocking various issues, but these issues do not affect Vorta for
unstable/sid and testing/bullseye.

What this bug actually seems to be requesting is access to Vorta on
Buster, and in a Debian context this should be achieved with a formal
backport.  Requests for backports should be sent to
debian-backports@lists.debian.org (I've CCed the list), should never be
filed on the BTS, and the priority of all such requests is "wishlist".
When requesting a backport it is useful to CC the package Maintainer and
Uploaders.

I chose to set this bug's priority to "minor" on the off-chance that
something in my packaging is not maximally correct.  For example, the
unversioned Paramiko dependency needs to be versioned, because a minimum
version is required.  I confess I ought to have noticed this sooner ^^

Please ping me for a progress update in two weeks.  I believe that I
have a functioning backport right now, but I need to take to take time
to test it, and also to investigate whether the changes are appropriate
for sid/testing.  If the changes are not appropriate, a no-change
backport will not be possible, but that's ok.  I'm optimistic that the
worst-case scenario is a delta between the source package in testing and
the future source package in buster-backports.

Thank you,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: