Re: Jessie backports gone?
Just chiming in from the peanut gallery: over on debian-user I've seen
discussions involving Wheezy and Jessie to the effect that:
* (Wheezy and) Jessie have been removed from the mirrors, and, iiuc, Jessie
is not in LTS (Long Term Support, iiuc) -- not directly relevant to the
problem, but
* Because Jessie is in LTS, jessie-backports is no longer relevant -- not
sure I understand completely, but, iiuc, all the stuff that was in jessie-
backports has been rolled into jessie LTS (which is now, as far as I know
(with the mirrors gone) only available on the debian.org (not .net) archive.
(I might have .org and .net confused, I know both exist, one seems to be for
current releases, the other seems to be for the archive.)
On Friday, April 05, 2019 08:34:19 AM L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> Hai Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the responce.
>
> That resulted in:
> E: Release file for
> http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/InRelease is
> expired (invalid since 44d 15h 58min 24s). Updates for this repository
> will not be applied.
>
> When done over https.
> W: Failed to fetch
> https://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64
> /Packages server certificate verification failed. CAfile:
> /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt CRLfile: none
>
> So looks like its there its just not usable.
> The host gives also certificate error when i check with my browser at
> https://archive.debian.org
>
> :-(
>
> Greetz,
>
> Louis
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: Thomas Bätzler [mailto:t.baetzler@bringe.com]
> > Verzonden: vrijdag 5 april 2019 14:02
> > Aan: debian-backports@lists.debian.org
> > CC: L.P.H. van Belle
> > Onderwerp: AW: Jessie backports gone?
> >
> > Hi Louis,
> >
> > > Can someone tell me wher i can find the jessie-backports.
> > > I dont see it on archive.debian.org and its gone of
> >
> > packages.debian.org
> >
> > Try "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports
> > main contrib
> > non-free".
> >
> > Best regards,
> > i.A. Thomas Bätzler
Reply to: