Re: flatpak_1.2.4-1~bpo9+1_source.changes REJECTED

To: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Cc: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>, debian-backports@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: flatpak_1.2.4-1~bpo9+1_source.changes REJECTED
From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 19:57:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20190331175709.GD14338@smithers.snow-crash.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 183eb96b-28c1-1e5c-aa2e-5a1247dd5e3d@thykier.net>
References: <E1hAWaz-000GKC-KC@fasolo.debian.org> <[🔎] 20190331162507.GA30460@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> <[🔎] 183eb96b-28c1-1e5c-aa2e-5a1247dd5e3d@thykier.net>

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019, Niels Thykier wrote:

> Simon McVittie:
> > On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 09:17:41 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> >> flatpak_1.2.4-1~bpo9+1_source.changes REJECTED: Not in testing
> > 
> > I was under the impression that clearly-marked security fixes were OK to
> > upload to -backports before they migrated to testing? Or is that
> > special-cased to not apply during hard freeze?
Indeed, during hard freeze we need a heads up that those fixes have been
unblocked. I can't follow every mail on -release. 

Please reupload. 

alex

Reply to:

References:
- Re: flatpak_1.2.4-1~bpo9+1_source.changes REJECTED
  - From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Re: flatpak_1.2.4-1~bpo9+1_source.changes REJECTED
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

Prev by Date: Re: flatpak_1.2.4-1~bpo9+1_source.changes REJECTED
Previous by thread: Re: flatpak_1.2.4-1~bpo9+1_source.changes REJECTED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread