On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 02:59:15PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hello Mattia.
Hi Martin,
> do you plan backporting dehydrated and do the migration letsencrypt.sh =>
> dehydrated for jessie-backports as well?
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dehydrated
Yes, in due time, which very hopefully means in the next 2 weeks.
I don't want to provide dehydrated in backports until I have an upgrade
plan from letsencrypt.sh to dehydrated, to which I started to work on
(sadly) only yesterday.
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/letsencrypt/dehydrated.git
> (I bet I could just use unstable/testing version of dehydrated instead.)
Yes, but that won't have any transition from letsencrypt.sh at all, at
the very least I want to provide the wrapper script. Arguably I could
already upload dehydrated to bpo, and then do the migration, but I don't
want to have 2 completely functional le.sh...
BTW, the version in unstable/testing has this bug
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/letsencrypt/dehydrated.git/commit/?id=79cef7d803afd988458c0f22a179a070fb288549
it might or might not affect you, if you're starting anew it doesn't.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature