El Divendres, 13 de maig de 2016, a les 12:12:44, Ben Hutchings va escriure: > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 08:19 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the current version of Samba in Jessie doesn't not work fine with Windows > > 10. > I think that's a great exaggeration. Microsoft tries hard to keep > Windows compatible with Samba, even working around old Samba bugs > because it's embedded in NAS boxes that are hard to upgrade. I just have written that it "doesn't work fine" . You can mount resources, but AFAIK you cannot login to a domain. I'm sorry if I what I wrote it was accurate. > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-September/193886.html > > [...] > > This report doesn't make much sense. If Windows 10 "tries to > negotiate" an option that Samba doesn't support, presumably it can > accept a refusal. Does Samba 4.1 claim to support the option, while > not actually implementing it properly? > If Samba 4.1 is buggy it should be fixed in jessie - not in jessie- > backports. Not buggy. The question is that Microsoft, with its new version, changed something that the version provided by Jessie doesn't work fine. That's all. But, I'll will check again. I admit that I must investigate more deeply this issue with my system. I agree that backports is not the proper place. I'm just thinking in a new functionality of the new version. Best regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.