[adding the bug on CC so it gets archived there too] On mar., 2016-03-22 at 11:57 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Julien Cristau wrote: > > It won't be in testing if it's not suitable for stable. That would > > defeat the purpose of testing. > Then it defeats the purpose of backports too. I have the feeling that won't lead us nowhere. Considering PPA (or PPA-like) is non-existent right now, I'm a bit lost on how to provide linux-grsec to interested stable users (I don't really think adding a sid source, even with pinning, is really nice for those users). Would stable-updates, with its faster update rhythm, something possible? Besides that, I'm a bit out of ideas. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part