[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#749479: Please include puppet into backports



Hi Raphael,

On 21:50 Wed 25 Feb     , Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Has there been any progress regarding the backport of puppet?
> I'm probably going to have to prepare the backports for work, so we could 
> try not to do things twice.
> 
> From some quick&dirty backports, I see that ruby-safe-yaml's test suite has 
> some failures under ruby 1.8 and 1.9.1. Have you taken a look at those?

I have the packages ready but haven't found the time to actually test 
them in production (although ADT runs fine).

As for ruby-safe-yaml, yes, I have already applied patches fixing 
compatibility with Ruby 1.8 and Ruby bug #6849 that affects our Ruby 
version.

I guess I can go ahead and upload at least the dependencies to 
wheezy-backports today. I'll post a followup.

Cheers and thanks for bringing this up,
Apollon


Reply to: