Re: Bug#749479: Please include puppet into backports
Hi Raphael,
On 21:50 Wed 25 Feb , Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has there been any progress regarding the backport of puppet?
> I'm probably going to have to prepare the backports for work, so we could
> try not to do things twice.
>
> From some quick&dirty backports, I see that ruby-safe-yaml's test suite has
> some failures under ruby 1.8 and 1.9.1. Have you taken a look at those?
I have the packages ready but haven't found the time to actually test
them in production (although ADT runs fine).
As for ruby-safe-yaml, yes, I have already applied patches fixing
compatibility with Ruby 1.8 and Ruby bug #6849 that affects our Ruby
version.
I guess I can go ahead and upload at least the dependencies to
wheezy-backports today. I'll post a followup.
Cheers and thanks for bringing this up,
Apollon
Reply to: