[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Ceph-maintainers] Updated ceph backport



On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:50:24 Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> As google-perftools are optional for ceph, the best fix for this is
> probably to remove the dependency in the backport for the architectures
> not supported in wheezy. This simple patch would probably do it (not
> tested):
> 
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index 96d98fa..f022982 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9~),
>                 libexpat1-dev,
>                 libfcgi-dev,
>                 libfuse-dev,
> -               libgoogle-perftools-dev [i386 amd64 powerpc armhf ppc64el],
> +               libgoogle-perftools-dev [i386 amd64],
>                 libkeyutils-dev,
>                 libleveldb-dev,
>                 libnss3-dev,
> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> index b3b0ccb..9941375 100755
> --- a/debian/rules
> +++ b/debian/rules
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), armel)
>  endif
> 
>  # Only selected architectures support gperftools
> -gperftools_archs = i386 amd64 powerpc armhf ppc64el
> +gperftools_archs = i386 amd64
>  ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(gperftools_archs)))
>    extraopts += --with-tcmalloc
>  else
> 

Noted, thank you. I'll consider applying this patch for next upload to 
backports.


> If there are no objections I can push this patch to the repository.

If you insist but IMHO it would be best to apply it as part of next backport 
which will be staged in "wheezy-backports" branch. Let's wait for 0.80.7-1 to 
migrate to "testing" first, shall we?

-- 
All the best,
 Dmitry Smirnov
 GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B

---
Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual
ignorance.
        -- H. L. Mencken

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: