On Du, 27 apr 14, 12:16:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> You probably want to read again what I mentioned in my very first
> mail: “-t wheezy-backports” *is* taken into account here, and it's
> showing the wheezy-backports version.
Yes, you are are right. However, I can reproduce the behaviour
('aptitude -t wheezy-backports show <package>' not showing the backports
version) with 0.6.8.2-1 (wheezy), but not 0.6.10-1 (testing/unstable),
so I guess something was changed/fixed in between.
The stable system has a quite clean sources.list (only wheezy + security
+ backports).
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature