Re: armadillo_4.100.2+dfsg-2~bpo70+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Kumar Appaiah <akumar@debian.org>]

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:00:09PM +0000, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> 
> Changes since stable missing. Did your forgot -v?

Hi Alex.

This is the changelog I think I used (snipped). I feel that I have
included all the changes. Did I miss something?

Thanks.

Kumar

armadillo (1:4.100.2+dfsg-2~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=low

  * New upstream release

 -- Kumar Appaiah <akumar@debian.org>  Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:51:49 -0400

armadillo (1:4.000.5+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * Bug fix to work around lapack inconsistency

 -- Kumar Appaiah <akumar@debian.org>  Tue, 04 Mar 2014 23:01:31 -0500

armadillo (1:4.000.4+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release

 -- Kumar Appaiah <akumar@debian.org>  Sun, 16 Feb 2014 06:05:51 -0500

armadillo (1:4.000.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * soname bumped to 4
  * Standards version is now 3.9.5 (no changes needed)
  * Depend on libarpack2-dev, instead of boost

 -- Kumar Appaiah <akumar@debian.org>  Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:16:32 -0500

armadillo (1:3.930.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release

 -- Kumar Appaiah <akumar@debian.org>  Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:32:13 -0500

armadillo (1:3.920.3+dfsg-1~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=low

  * New upstream release

 -- Kumar Appaiah <akumar@debian.org>  Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:08:21 -0500