On Ma, 21 oct 14, 22:01:56, Alejandro Exojo wrote: > El Tuesday 21 October 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escribió: > > > > I have just filled a bug report about it and will surely be fixing it soon. > > Oh, I thought that for backports there was no BTS and this mailing list should > be contacted. Should bugs to backported Qt be reported other way? This is true, since the backport maintainer might not be the "regular" package maintainer. However, if backport and regular package maintainer are the same person the package maintainer is of course free to track the issue in the BTS. Besides, the bug might also be present in testing ;) Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature