Re: yasm_1.2.0-1~bpo70+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Mads Hansen <d@taba.se>]

Hi Alexander,

Thanks for your email. I'm new to packaging and backporting, so I don't 
understand why this was rejected, although I suspect it might be because 
of the issues Vincent mentioned on the backports mailing list (see 
below). At any rate, I'd be happy to fix the problems if you could 
please tell me what needs to be done.

Best regards,
Mads

> There's some unwanted noise in your backported yasm package, i.e.
> here's what the debdiff looks like right now:
>
> diff -u yasm-1.2.0/debian/changelog yasm-1.2.0/debian/changelog
> --- yasm-1.2.0/debian/changelog
> +++ yasm-1.2.0/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +yasm (1.2.0-1~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=low
> +
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +  * Rebuild for wheezy-backports
> +
> + -- Mads Hansen<d@taba.se>   Sun, 20 Apr 2014 18:44:47 +0200
> +
>   yasm (1.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
>     * New upstream release.
> only in patch2:
> unchanged:
> --- yasm-1.2.0.orig/.pc/.quilt_patches
> +++ yasm-1.2.0/.pc/.quilt_patches
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +debian/patches
> only in patch2:
> unchanged:
> --- yasm-1.2.0.orig/.pc/.version
> +++ yasm-1.2.0/.pc/.version
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +2
> only in patch2:
> unchanged:
> --- yasm-1.2.0.orig/.pc/.quilt_series
> +++ yasm-1.2.0/.pc/.quilt_series
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +series




On 01-05-2014 12:00, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Rejected as requested.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.