If it's not too much effort as well, what about a squeeze-backports-sloppy version of gnutls28 as well?On 2013-10-20 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> wrote: [...]Would having gnutls28 in wheezy-backports be something feasible to do? Does the backports team have concerns regarding this? Maybe anyone has already started looking into that?[...] Hello, I think it should be possible without much effort and will take a look at it. cu Andreas
Thanks, Edward