Re: getting rid of the .changes requirements

[Kumar Appaiah <a.kumar@alumni.iitm.ac.in>]

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:26:28PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:02:01PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >  My personal opinion was always that there is no way currently to get
> > the full changelog -- which isn't true anymore.  The packages website
> > already links the full changelog also for backports packages, and I
> > definitely enjoy that we managed to get there.  What currently is still
> > missing for me being a bit more pleased is that aptitude changelog would
> > be able to show the changelog of a backported packate.
> 
> Just use 'apt-get changelog' instead of aptitude.

Apologies, but I did not understand. What do you mean by 'apt-get
changelog'?

Thanks.

Kumar

-- 
On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a 'BREAK'
- everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS.
		-- Tarl Neustaedter