[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rsyslog_7.4.4-1~bpo70+1_amd64.changes REJECTED


Am 29.09.2013 01:13, schrieb Micah Anderson:
> Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> writes:
>> Am 29.09.2013 00:00, schrieb Alexander Wirt:
>>> As requested by uploader.
>> Hm, what's going on here?
> Sorry, I backported it without talking to you and then uploaded it and
> realized not only was that was wrong, but the reason I was backporting
> it was for the mmanon module, but that module doesn't do what I want[0],
> so I thought it would be better if I didn't become responsible for that
> backport, so I requested that the backport be rejected.
> 0. http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477

Well, I was going to upload a backport of rsyslog v7 anyway, that's why
I had started uploading librelp to bpo and poking Pierre about a bpo
upload for libestr.
I wouldn't have been bothered if rsyslog had been accepted fwiw, but a
quick email beforehand would be nice to e.g. avoid duplicate work.
I'm very open to backports, as I think it's a nice service for our
users. We just need to make sure we don't do it too much in an
uncoordinated way (without the inclusion of the individual package
maintainer for example).


Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: