Re: Backports integrated into the main archive
Marc Haber <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:04:01PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> Marc Haber schrieb am Monday, den 18. March 2013:
>> > Does this in any way modify the rules regarding version numbers? Is
>> > there any change to use the target suite name instead of bpo$NUMBER in
>> > the version number?
>> Nope. Suite names don't sort well.
> So the string "bpo" is going to stay to remind us of backports' origins?
Have it meaning BackPOrts and you're fine