Hi there! On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:24:06 +0200, Bart Swedrowski wrote: > On 30 September 2012 12:43, Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> wrote: >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >> bacula-common : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but >> 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed >> bacula-fd : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but >> 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed >> E: Broken packages >> mantissa:~# > > Whoops - pretty embarrassing. I fixed that in 5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+2 > (i.e reverted it back to use /var/run). Please see > http://sultan.timedout.org/~bart/debian/barts-squeeze-backports/ again [...] > Let me know should you spot anything else. But I reckon it should be > good to go now. Now everything is fine, but as I previously wrote: <http://lists.debian.org/87391zivmj.fsf@gismo.pca.it> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:30:22 +0200, Bart Swedrowski wrote: > I'd like to ask for a review and upload of Bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-5_bpo60+1 packages. Backports are permitted only for the same version which is in testing, i.e. 5.2.6+dfsg-2, so we need to wait until 5.2.6+dfsg-5 enters that distribution. 5.2.6+dfsg-5 has not yet migrated to wheezy, (sort of) too young and also because there is a serious bug WRT to policy (#688199) reported against 5.2.6+dfsg-3 and still present in 5.2.6+dfsg-5. I agree with Alexandro's solution, but as you noticed I do not have a lot of free time lately, so I am not sure I can fix it in the next days. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpv_nrwNMYIl.pgp
Description: PGP signature