[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: xpra/0.3.10+dfsg-1~bpo60+1

Hi Matt,

Thank you for quick reply.

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:21:08 Matt Taggart wrote:
> Packages normally need to be in 'testing' first. Please read
>   http://backports-master.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3

I know thank you -- I read before 

> Version 0.3.2+dfsg-1 would be OK.

No it won't, sorry. :)

0.3.2 is not usable and it have multiple known serious problems.

I'm a xpra co-maintainer and we have an unblock request with release team. 

Worth noticing that 0.3.x branch is a most conservative bugfix-only branch.
Some time ago upstream moved to 0.4.x (deprecated) then to 0.5.x (deprecated) 
and later to 0.6.x (current).

> maybe David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> (cc'd) would have an opinion (or
> be willing to sponsor the upload).

David, my hopes are with you. ;)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: