Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade

To: noname noname <off220@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-backports@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade
From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:19:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120124101913.GD6842@hawking.credativ.lan>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAJe8yAs65cmRGJ4=sw9-HvbzFpkoHvS=cON5fezoPZC=tDbaBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAJe8yAs65cmRGJ4=sw9-HvbzFpkoHvS=cON5fezoPZC=tDbaBg@mail.gmail.com>

noname noname schrieb am Dienstag, den 24. Januar 2012:

> so the only way is to switch to kernel 3.1 from backports or stay with
> default 2.6.32, right?
Indeed. 

Alex
-- 
Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de 
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA  B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade
  - From: "off220@gmail.com" <off220@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade
  - From: noname noname <off220@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade
Next by Date: Re: Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade
Previous by thread: Re: Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade
Next by thread: Re: Re: kernel 2.6.39 upgrade
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread