Re: dpkg_1.16.1.1~bpo60+1_i386.changes REJECTED
Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Montag, den 07. November 2011:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > So, to sum it up: I totally understand why a backport of dpkg-dev would
> > be wanted and makes sense (to some degree, see next paragraph), but the
> > situation is that dpkg-dev isn't a source package on its own and given
>
> I can easily tweak the .changes files to only upload dpkg-dev and
> libdpkg-perl.
>
> Would you be ready to try this?
Do we have an upgrade way to the new version that its unstable soon? I don't
want an old version without updates in bpo.
Alex
--
Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A
Reply to: