Hi, while thinking “libdrm is trivial to backport”, I realized it's a bit untrue. libdrm-nouveau1 is replaced by libdrm-nouveau1a (upstream broke ABI). Reverse dependencies come from those packages: - libdrm obviously (-dev, -dbg), - mesa (but not in squeeze), - plymouth. Backporting libdrm to squeeze means no longer providing with the libdrm-nouveau1 package, and providing libdrm-nouveau1a instead. This means plymouth becomes uninstallable, since it depends on the former. BinNMUing makes it build successfully against the latter. That was done in unstable already, I guess it's 1. feasible, and 2. wanted to do so in squeeze-backports as well, so that plymouth is installable along new libdrm. Thoughts? Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature